I am increasingly convinced that AI agents controlled by and answerable to the user (ideally provided by not for profit privacy protection organizations and licenced humans to assist) are the way to equip all users with the tools to interact with AI services so that it's a more balanced playing field for interaction and data sharing mangement, for which regulation may also play a part.
Cyber-insurance, which is increasingly concerned with personal data breaches/misuse will provide the financial incentive.
Great discussion, Phil - I think you touch upon two important areas in SSI and identity as access control.
1) In healthcare, "access control" means allowing you access to your data about you.
2) Looking at your DALL-E graphic, it makes me think of SSI in terms of Zero Trust. How do I know those ppl in uniforms that just say "Police" are authorized validators or my verifiable presentation?
I am increasingly convinced that AI agents controlled by and answerable to the user (ideally provided by not for profit privacy protection organizations and licenced humans to assist) are the way to equip all users with the tools to interact with AI services so that it's a more balanced playing field for interaction and data sharing mangement, for which regulation may also play a part.
Cyber-insurance, which is increasingly concerned with personal data breaches/misuse will provide the financial incentive.
Great discussion, Phil - I think you touch upon two important areas in SSI and identity as access control.
1) In healthcare, "access control" means allowing you access to your data about you.
2) Looking at your DALL-E graphic, it makes me think of SSI in terms of Zero Trust. How do I know those ppl in uniforms that just say "Police" are authorized validators or my verifiable presentation?
Thanks as always.