Security professionals have long taught that organizations should limit the access individuals have in computer systems to just those privileges necessary to perform their job.
My question is...Where does self-ownership fit into PoLP?
PoLP is undoubtedly effective for minimizing risk by strictly limiting permissions based on roles. However, it can inadvertently create a frustrating paradox: blocking you from critical actions on your own data. For example, what happens when you need to delete or manage your biometric data, but your role doesn’t grant you the necessary permissions?
Why limit the use of "zero trust" principle to the scope of an individual organization? The entire trust layer of the Internet should (and could) be based on it.
My question is...Where does self-ownership fit into PoLP?
PoLP is undoubtedly effective for minimizing risk by strictly limiting permissions based on roles. However, it can inadvertently create a frustrating paradox: blocking you from critical actions on your own data. For example, what happens when you need to delete or manage your biometric data, but your role doesn’t grant you the necessary permissions?
Why limit the use of "zero trust" principle to the scope of an individual organization? The entire trust layer of the Internet should (and could) be based on it.
https://timohotti.substack.com/p/introducing-the-internet-trust-layer